Institutional Repository of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden
| Comparison of five exergoenvironmental methods applied to candidate energy systems for rural villages in developing countries | |
| Banerjee, A. | |
| 2011 | |
| Source Publication | Energy
![]() |
| ISSN | 0360-5442 |
| Volume | 36Issue:5Pages:2650-2661 |
| Abstract | This paper tackles the environmental impact assessment of different energy systems for rural communities in developing countries. Ten systems are proposed, modelled, and assessed by five published methods: ReCiPe indicator combined with exergy, exergy wasted, thermo-ecological cost, extended exergy accounting, and extended thermoeconomics. All the methods constitute life cycle assessment (LCA) and mathematically take a similar form, combining an environmental impact assessment with exergetic analysis. Despite the inevitable difference of weighting between methods, most showed clear benefits to using responsibly grown Jatropha oil (rather than diesel) to generate electricity and all showed clear benefits of biogas over solar thermal or fuelwood heat. Analyses of error and sensitivity are presented at the end of the results and discussion section. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| Document Type | 期刊论文 |
| Identifier | https://ir.xtbg.ac.cn/handle/353005/8025 |
| Collection | 热带植物资源可持续利用重点实验室特色文献_小桐子相关文献 |
| Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Banerjee, A.. Comparison of five exergoenvironmental methods applied to candidate energy systems for rural villages in developing countries[J]. Energy,2011,36(5):2650-2661. |
| APA | Banerjee, A..(2011).Comparison of five exergoenvironmental methods applied to candidate energy systems for rural villages in developing countries.Energy,36(5),2650-2661. |
| MLA | Banerjee, A.."Comparison of five exergoenvironmental methods applied to candidate energy systems for rural villages in developing countries".Energy 36.5(2011):2650-2661. |
| Files in This Item: | Download All | |||||
| File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
| Comparison of five e(337KB) | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | View Download | |||
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment