| Combining camera trap surveys and IUCN range maps to improve knowledge of species distributions | |
Chen, Cheng; Granados, Alys2; Brodie, Jedediah F.; Kays, Roland5,6; Davies, T. Jonathan; Liu, Runzhe9; Fisher, Jason T.; Ahumada, Jorge11; Mcshea, William12; Sheil, Douglas13,14,15; Mohd-Azlan, Jayasilan; Agwanda, Bernard17; Andrianarisoa, Mahandry H.; Appleton, Robyn D.; Bitariho, Robert20; Espinosa, Santiago21,22; Grigione, Melissa M.; Helgen, Kristofer M.; Hubbard, Andy25; Hurtado, Cindy M.; Jansen, Patrick A.; Jiang, Xuelong28; Jones, Alex29; Kalies, Elizabeth L.; Kiebou-Opepa, Cisquet; Li, Xueyou28; Lima, Marcela Guimaraes Moreira32; Meyer, Erik33; Miller, Anna B.; Murphy, Thomas35; Piana, Renzo19; Quan, Rui-Chang ; Rota, Christopher T.; Rovero, Francesco38,39; Santos, Fernanda40; Schuttler, Stephanie5; Uduman, Aisha; van Bommel, Joanna Klees; Young, Hilary41; Burton, A. Cole
| |
| 2024 | |
| Source Publication | CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
 |
| ISSN | 0888-8892 |
| Pages | - |
| Abstract | Reliable maps of species distributions are fundamental for biodiversity research and conservation. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) range maps are widely recognized as authoritative representations of species' geographic limits, yet they might not always align with actual occurrence data. In recent area of habitat (AOH) maps, areas that are not habitat have been removed from IUCN ranges to reduce commission errors, but their concordance with actual species occurrence also remains untested. We tested concordance between occurrences recorded in camera trap surveys and predicted occurrences from the IUCN and AOH maps for 510 medium- to large-bodied mammalian species in 80 camera trap sampling areas. Across all areas, cameras detected only 39% of species expected to occur based on IUCN ranges and AOH maps; 85% of the IUCN only mismatches occurred within 200 km of range edges. Only 4% of species occurrences were detected by cameras outside IUCN ranges. The probability of mismatches between cameras and the IUCN range was significantly higher for smaller-bodied mammals and habitat specialists in the Neotropics and Indomalaya and in areas with shorter canopy forests. Our findings suggest that range and AOH maps rarely underrepresent areas where species occur, but they may more often overrepresent ranges by including areas where a species may be absent, particularly at range edges. We suggest that combining range maps with data from ground-based biodiversity sensors, such as camera traps, provides a richer knowledge base for conservation mapping and planning. |
| Keyword | camera trap IUCN mammal distribution mammal occurrence range map species distributions |
| Subject Area | Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.14221 |
| Indexed By | SCI |
| Language | 英语 |
| WOS ID | WOS:001187366600001 |
| Citation statistics | |
| Document Type | 期刊论文 |
| Identifier | https://ir.xtbg.ac.cn/handle/353005/14088 |
| Collection | 2012年后新成立研究组 |
| Affiliation | 1.Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest Resources Management, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 2.Univ British Columbia, Biodivers Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3.Felidae Conservat Fund, Mill Valley, CA USA 4.Brodie, Jedediah F.] Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, Missoula, MT USA 5.Brodie, Jedediah F.] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Missoula, MT USA 6.North Carolina Museum Nat Sci, Raleigh, NC USA 7.North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC USA 8.Univ British Columbia, Dept Bot, Vancouver, BC, Canada 9.Davies, T. Jonathan; Appleton, Robyn D.] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest & Conservat Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada 10.Lund Univ, Biol Dept, Lund, Sweden 11.Fisher, Jason T.] Univ Victoria, Sch Environm Studies, Victoria, BC, Canada 12.Moore Ctr Sci, Conservat Int, Arlington, VA 22201 USA 13.Smithsonians Natl Zoo & Conservat Biol Inst, Conservat Ecol Ctr, Front Royal, VA USA 14.Wageningen Univ & Res, Forest Ecol & Forest Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands 15.Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, Akershus, Norway 16.Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor, Indonesia 17.Univ Malaysia Sarawak, Inst Biodivers & Environm Conservat, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia 18.Natl Museums Kenya, Mammal Sect, Nairobi, Kenya 19.Andrianarisoa, Mahandry H.] Ctr ValBio, Ifanadiana, Madagascar 20.Spectacled Bear Conservat Soc Peru, Lambayeque, Peru 21.Mbarara Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Trop Forest Conservat, Kabale, Uganda 22.Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Fac Ciencias, San Luis Potosi, Mexico 23.Pontificia Univ Catolica Ecuador, Escuela Ciencias Biol, Quito, Ecuador 24.Grigione, Melissa M.] Pace Univ, Dept Biol, Pleasantville, NY 10570 USA 25.Helgen, Kristofer M.] Australian Museum, Australian Museum Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia 26.Natl Pk Serv, Sonoran Desert Network, Tucson, AZ USA 27.Jansen, Patrick A.] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wildlife Ecol & Conservat Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands 28.Jansen, Patrick A.] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Panama City, Panama 29.Chinese Acad Sci, Kunming Inst Zool, State Key Lab Genet Resources & Evolut, Kunming, Peoples R China 30.Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Campus Nat Reserves, Santa Cruz, CA USA 31.Kalies, Elizabeth L.] Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC USA 32.Wildlife Conservat Soc, Congo Program, Brazzaville, Rep Congo 33.Univ Fed Para, Lab Conservat Biogeog & Macroecol, Belem, Brazil 34.Sequoia & Kings Canyon Natl Pk, Three Rivers, CA USA 35.Miller, Anna B.] Utah State Univ, Inst Outdoor Recreat & Tourism, Dept Environm & Soc, Logan, UT 84322 USA 36.Edmonds Coll, Dept Anthropol, Lynnwood, WA USA 37.Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Integrat Conservat, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Mengla, Peoples R China 38.Rota, Christopher T.] West Virginia Univ, Div Forestry & Nat Resources, Morgantown, WV USA 39.Univ Florence, Dept Biol, Trento, Italy 40.MUSE Museo Sci, Trento, Italy 41.Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, Brazil 42.Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Ecol Evolut & Marine Biol, Santa Barbara, CA USA |
| Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Chen, Cheng,Granados, Alys,Brodie, Jedediah F.,et al. Combining camera trap surveys and IUCN range maps to improve knowledge of species distributions[J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY,2024:-. |
| APA | Chen, Cheng.,Granados, Alys.,Brodie, Jedediah F..,Kays, Roland.,Davies, T. Jonathan.,...&Burton, A. Cole.(2024).Combining camera trap surveys and IUCN range maps to improve knowledge of species distributions.CONSERVATION BIOLOGY,-. |
| MLA | Chen, Cheng,et al."Combining camera trap surveys and IUCN range maps to improve knowledge of species distributions".CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2024):-. |
| Files in This Item: | Download All | |||||
| File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
| Combining camera tra（1153KB） | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | View Download | |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment