Current trends suggest most Asian countries are unlikely to meet future biodiversity targets on protected areas | |
Farhadinia, Mohammad S.; Waldron, Anthony2; Kaszta, Zaneta4; Eid, Ehab5; Hughes, Alice6; Ambarli, Huseyin7,8; Al-Hikmani, Hadi; Buuveibaatar, Bayarbaatar10; Gritsina, Mariya A.; Haidir, Iding12; Islam, Zafar-Ul; Kabir, Muhammad14; Khanal, Gopal15; Koshkin, Maxim A.; Kulenbekov, Rahim16; Kubanychbekov, Zairbek16; Maheshwari, Aishwarya17; Penjor, Ugyen; Raza, Hana; Rosen, Tatjana16; Yachmennikova, Anna; Rozhnov, Viatcheslav V.; Yamaguchi, Nobuyuki19; Johnson, Paul J.; Macdonald, David W. | |
2022 | |
Source Publication | COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
![]() |
Volume | 5Issue:1Pages:- |
Abstract | Aichi Target 11 committed governments to protect >= 17% of their terrestrial environments by 2020, yet it was rarely achieved, raising questions about the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework goal to protect 30% by 2030. Asia is a challenging continent for such targets, combining high biodiversity with dense human populations. Here, we evaluated achievements in Asia against Aichi Target 11. We found that Asia was the most underperforming continent globally, with just 13.2% of terrestrial protected area (PA) coverage, averaging 14.1 +/- SE 1.8% per country in 2020. 73.1% of terrestrial ecoregions had <17% representation and only 7% of PAs even had an assessment of management effectiveness. We found that a higher agricultural land in 2015 was associated with lower PA coverage today. Asian countries also showed a remarkably slow average annual pace of 0.4 +/- SE 0.1% increase of PA extent. These combined lines of evidence suggest that the ambitious 2030 targets are unlikely to be achieved in Asia unless the PA coverage to increase 2.4-5.9 times faster. We provided three recommendations to support Asian countries to meet their post-2020 biodiversity targets: complete reporting and the wider adoption other effective area-based conservation measures; restoring disturbed landscapes; and bolstering transboundary PAs. Asia is shown to be behind in meeting the Aichi Target 11 under the Convention on Biological Diversity and current trends indicate that 2030 targets are unlikely to be achieved with severe impact on biodiversity. |
Subject Area | Biology ; Multidisciplinary Sciences |
DOI | 10.1038/s42003-022-04061-w |
Indexed By | SCI |
Language | 英语 |
WOS ID | WOS:000889756800001 |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | 期刊论文 |
Identifier | https://ir.xtbg.ac.cn/handle/353005/13300 |
Collection | 2012年后新成立研究组 |
Affiliation | 1.[Farhadinia, Mohammad S.] Univ Oxford, Oxford Martin Sch, Oxford, England 2.Farhadinia, Mohammad S.] Univ Oxford, Dept Biol, Oxford, England 3.Cambridge Conservat Initiat, David Attenborough Bldg, Cambridge, England 4.Kaszta, Zaneta; Haidir, Iding; Penjor, Ugyen; Johnson, Paul J.; Macdonald, David W.] Univ Oxford, Dept Biol, Wildlife Conservat Res Unit, Oxford, England 5.No Arizona Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Box 5640, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA 6.Eco Values Sustainable Dev, Lutfi Quder St, Amman 11610, Jordan 7.Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Integrat Conservat, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Kunming 666303, Yunnan, Peoples R China 8.Duzce Univ, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Management, TR-81620 Duzce, Turkey 9.Tech Univ Munich, Terr Ecol Res Grp, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany 10.POB 82, Sadah 100, Oman 11.Wildlife Conservat Soc, Mongolia Program, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 12.Gritsina, Mariya A.] Acad Sci Uzbek, Inst Zool, Tashkent, Uzbekistan 13.Indonesian Minist Environm & Forestry, Directorate Gen Nat Resources & Ecosyst Conservat, Jakarta, Indonesia 14.Prince Saud al Faisal Wildlife Res Ctr, Field Res Dept, Taif, Saudi Arabia 15.Univ Haripur, Dept Forestry & Wildlife Management, Haripur, Pakistan 16.Govt Nepal, Minist Forests & Environm, Dept Natl Pk & Wildlife Conservat, Kathmandu, Nepal 17.Caucasus Nat Fund, Tbilisi, Georgia 18.Vasundhara Sect 5, Vasundhara Sector 201012, Uttar Pradesh, India 19.Yachmennikova, Anna; Rozhnov, Viatcheslav V.] Russian Acad Sci, AN Severtsov Inst Ecol & Evolut, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Moscow 119071, Russia 20.Univ Malaysia Terengganu, Inst Trop Biodivers & Sustainable Dev, Terengganu 21030, Malaysia |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Farhadinia, Mohammad S.,Waldron, Anthony,Kaszta, Zaneta,et al. Current trends suggest most Asian countries are unlikely to meet future biodiversity targets on protected areas[J]. COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY,2022,5(1):-. |
APA | Farhadinia, Mohammad S..,Waldron, Anthony.,Kaszta, Zaneta.,Eid, Ehab.,Hughes, Alice.,...&Macdonald, David W..(2022).Current trends suggest most Asian countries are unlikely to meet future biodiversity targets on protected areas.COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY,5(1),-. |
MLA | Farhadinia, Mohammad S.,et al."Current trends suggest most Asian countries are unlikely to meet future biodiversity targets on protected areas".COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY 5.1(2022):-. |
Files in This Item: | Download All | |||||
File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
Current trends sugge(1454KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | View Download |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment